Elementals & Elementaries: various types of spirits

Continuing my series on H.P. Blavatsky’s writings I come upon a theme that is constant in Blavatsky’s writings and is still relevant today. The basic question Blavatsky answers here is: what kind of spirits are mediums (or channelers) likely to be talking to? In her day spiritualists claimed to be talking mainly to the spirits of the dead. This is still what mediums like Char claim in the 21st century.

Blavatsky said to that: this is not very likely. Continue reading Elementals & Elementaries: various types of spirits

Spiritual Growth and Sunyata

I explained the difference and convergence of Sunyata and Nirvana yesterday. Today I want to go into what that means for every day spirituality. This is where the Buddhist tradition offers a variety of responses. There are those who feel that one first has to practice virtue, live up to the ideals of the many vows that Mahayana Buddhism knows and only then can one even start the meditation that leads to Nirvana.

In response to modernity this path has been shortened considerably. Many Western Buddhists practice meditation while not living up to even the (deceptively simple) five precepts. Then again: the aim of meditation has changed as well. Most people practice it not to gain Nirvana, but to live happier lives in the world. The aim to withdraw from the world and gain a disinterested wisdom is a rare one. Traditional Buddhists might interpret this as just another way of showing that the dharma can no longer produce arhats (people who are enlightened).

In Western Buddhism there is a contrary stream of the insight that however much some Zen masters may stress that satori (enlightenment) is something that happens in the blink of an eye – they did expect their students to live a certain kind of life. A certain lifestyle was implied, even though some zen teachers weren’t married.

I’m of the position Continue reading Spiritual Growth and Sunyata

To my Buddhist (and semi-Buddhist) readers

I feel blessed to already have so many readers and comments that I have to explain my basic attitude to blogging and spirituality not just to theosophists, but to (Western) Buddhists as well.

First off: my basic concern is the pursuit of wisdom, not knowledge. This is what I also tried to say in my post about jnana yoga, but I’m not sure that came across.

Wisdom is for me not just Continue reading To my Buddhist (and semi-Buddhist) readers

More theosophy

Since one reader here commented that this was the first theosophical blog she’d seen  – I think it’s time to introduce some of my fellow online bloggers. First of all: I”m keeping track of our small community on my page about theosophical blogs – the wisest spirituality online 🙂 (let’s live up to that, shall we?)

The two main blogs are group blogs, both started by Chris Richardson: Continue reading More theosophy

What I Believe

Let’s start with the comfortable fact that as a Theosophist – what I believe is totally free. There are no dogmas theosophists have to subscribe to. Nothing is mandatory. No trinitarian God, no ‘Mohammad is the Messenger’, no mandatory belief of any kind. We even have atheists among us.

Still – I do believe in some things. And many of the things I believe in are beliefs shared by other theosophists. Here goes: Continue reading What I Believe

On being personal – or impersonal

This is for my theosophical readers.

Blogs are a personal medium. Having quit college I’m going to spend the coming months (at least) trying to find my own voice – instead of struggling with the demands of scientific writing. I’m going to try finding my own voice – and that’s not the voice of the Theosophist or even Quest Magazine. Continue reading On being personal – or impersonal