<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Karma in the Bhagavad Gita</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allconsidering.com/2010/karma-bhagavad-gita/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2010/karma-bhagavad-gita/</link>
	<description>Considering life, spiritual growth and more ponderings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:34:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Appan</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2010/karma-bhagavad-gita/comment-page-1/#comment-42030</link>
		<dc:creator>Appan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 07:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=913#comment-42030</guid>
		<description>1) To summarize ‘karma’  by these points  as defined  by Gita ,will be inadequate. Karma is not action alone  but also the acquired predilection of one&#039;s actions in this and past lives. Secondly “survival’ was not an issue with Arjuna as he was an impeccable warrior and death was always  one of the accepted outcomes.

Bhagavan Krishna had orchestrated the Mahabharata war to establish ‘Dharma’ and Arjuna was only a tool in his hand. In reality Arjuna had no choice but to fight.

2) Arjuna was in a dilemma because he believed that he was about to kill his own people. Bhagavan explains to him that this fear was a spiritual misconception as they  were not merely physical beings  but they were the  everlasting souls which is deathless. In  Sanatana Dharma, the human soul is realised as &#039;Atma&#039;, which is pure consciousness that is never born and thus cannot die.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) To summarize ‘karma’  by these points  as defined  by Gita ,will be inadequate. Karma is not action alone  but also the acquired predilection of one&#8217;s actions in this and past lives. Secondly “survival’ was not an issue with Arjuna as he was an impeccable warrior and death was always  one of the accepted outcomes.</p>
<p>Bhagavan Krishna had orchestrated the Mahabharata war to establish ‘Dharma’ and Arjuna was only a tool in his hand. In reality Arjuna had no choice but to fight.</p>
<p>2) Arjuna was in a dilemma because he believed that he was about to kill his own people. Bhagavan explains to him that this fear was a spiritual misconception as they  were not merely physical beings  but they were the  everlasting souls which is deathless. In  Sanatana Dharma, the human soul is realised as &#8216;Atma&#8217;, which is pure consciousness that is never born and thus cannot die.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nothing2saynow</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2010/karma-bhagavad-gita/comment-page-1/#comment-41823</link>
		<dc:creator>Nothing2saynow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=913#comment-41823</guid>
		<description>Can the scope of Karma (action) as defined by Gita be summarized by these three points -

1) Do every action that is necessary for survival for there is no choice but to perform all your responsibilities that are given to you by the virtue of birth or the one&#039;s that you have taken upon yourself during your lifetime.

2) When faced with a dilemma of being required to perform an action that is against your principles or liking, do the minimal required as demanded by the situation. Don&#039;t regret or feel guilty about it.

3) Give yourself completely to the action. It is in human nature to feel motivated by the benefits or the results of any action. Krishna doesn&#039;t mean that perform the action without being interested in the results but rather implies to not get carried away by the outcome of your action. He doesn&#039;t want you to fall in the pit of despair if the outcome is not favorable. Similarly, he doesn&#039;t want you to feel so excited that you become over confident and callous if the results meet your expectations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can the scope of Karma (action) as defined by Gita be summarized by these three points -</p>
<p>1) Do every action that is necessary for survival for there is no choice but to perform all your responsibilities that are given to you by the virtue of birth or the one&#8217;s that you have taken upon yourself during your lifetime.</p>
<p>2) When faced with a dilemma of being required to perform an action that is against your principles or liking, do the minimal required as demanded by the situation. Don&#8217;t regret or feel guilty about it.</p>
<p>3) Give yourself completely to the action. It is in human nature to feel motivated by the benefits or the results of any action. Krishna doesn&#8217;t mean that perform the action without being interested in the results but rather implies to not get carried away by the outcome of your action. He doesn&#8217;t want you to fall in the pit of despair if the outcome is not favorable. Similarly, he doesn&#8217;t want you to feel so excited that you become over confident and callous if the results meet your expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praveen</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2010/karma-bhagavad-gita/comment-page-1/#comment-34903</link>
		<dc:creator>Praveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 13:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=913#comment-34903</guid>
		<description>Buddhists were never driven out of India. To my knowledge, it originated and flourished in Indian subcontinent and from there it spread to neighboring countries like China, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka and many South eastern countries. The Indian ruler Ashoka was a Hindu and he later converted to Buddhism. His kingdom was spread over whole of Indian subcontinent including parts of Pakistan and Afghanistan. He is credited for the spread of Buddhism in the outer world and India. He preached non violence and did prominent work for the spread of this particular faith. However he never imposed it to the common people unlike Islam which was forced upon the Hindu population. This approach was never adopted by Buddhists or by Ashoka as he himself was liberal and respected other religious faiths and their values.

The faiths like Buddhism and Jainism and to some extent Sikhism are considered very close to Hinduism.The Hindus see Buddha as an incarnation of Lord Vishnu. You will be amazed to know that Lord Krishna is also an incarnation of Lord Vishnu according to Hindu Mythology. 

The language of Buddha was definitely not Dravidian as he gave his sermons in &quot;Pali&quot; and &quot;Prakrit&quot; which were popular among the common people unlike Sanskrit which was used mainly for religious purposes and by the knowledgeable. Thus he used a language which can be easily understood by the common man. Pali and Prakrit were derived from Sanskrit and their origin and grammar can be traced back to Sanskrit. Buddhism, in fact, has many religious text written in Sanskrit.

The Indians have an identity and culture of their own and they do not have to borrow it from somebody else. The Aryan Invasion Theory which you are talking about has no relevance in today&#039;s world and many recent researches have proved that so called Aryans were original inhabitants of the Indus Valley Civilization.

Every religion in this world, including Christianity and Islam have &quot;Popes&quot; and &quot;Caliphs&quot; to formulate rules and guidelines for their followers and the same is also true for Hinduism to some extent. However, if the Church says that the Earth is the center of the Universe, then are you going to believe them? or find out the truth on your own.

The killer of Gandhi cannot be termed as  a Hindu or preacher of Gita. He was just a brain washed Lunatic who could never understand the true meaning of Gita or Hinduism. Therefore, calling him a preacher of Hinduism is similar to saying that &quot;Jehadis&quot; are followers of Islam.

If you want to talk about facts then please verify them before using them as Krishna never killed his uncle without any reason. He killed him because his uncle was known for his atrocious and oppressive rule. He did what was in the benefit of mankind even if it meant killing his own uncle. Thus he was following his Karma.

Yes, I agree that some of the Indians see many religions with suspicion but their is a scientific explanation for this behavior. The Indian Society has faced the brutality and atrocities of many outsiders like Mughals and Britishers for hundreds of years who tried to impose their religious views on the Indian people with brute force. Thus this attitude of some Indians was used by the fanatics to their advantage and for personal gains.

However, a rational person whether he is a Hindu, Christian or a Muslim knows that the almighty has given him a very powerful weapon to protect himself from these evil ideas and that is his own conscience. I am a Hindu and respect Jesus, Allah, Moses, and Krishna in the same way as I know that it is the God in the end to whom I am accountable.

I hope this will clear some of your misconceptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buddhists were never driven out of India. To my knowledge, it originated and flourished in Indian subcontinent and from there it spread to neighboring countries like China, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka and many South eastern countries. The Indian ruler Ashoka was a Hindu and he later converted to Buddhism. His kingdom was spread over whole of Indian subcontinent including parts of Pakistan and Afghanistan. He is credited for the spread of Buddhism in the outer world and India. He preached non violence and did prominent work for the spread of this particular faith. However he never imposed it to the common people unlike Islam which was forced upon the Hindu population. This approach was never adopted by Buddhists or by Ashoka as he himself was liberal and respected other religious faiths and their values.</p>
<p>The faiths like Buddhism and Jainism and to some extent Sikhism are considered very close to Hinduism.The Hindus see Buddha as an incarnation of Lord Vishnu. You will be amazed to know that Lord Krishna is also an incarnation of Lord Vishnu according to Hindu Mythology. </p>
<p>The language of Buddha was definitely not Dravidian as he gave his sermons in &#8220;Pali&#8221; and &#8220;Prakrit&#8221; which were popular among the common people unlike Sanskrit which was used mainly for religious purposes and by the knowledgeable. Thus he used a language which can be easily understood by the common man. Pali and Prakrit were derived from Sanskrit and their origin and grammar can be traced back to Sanskrit. Buddhism, in fact, has many religious text written in Sanskrit.</p>
<p>The Indians have an identity and culture of their own and they do not have to borrow it from somebody else. The Aryan Invasion Theory which you are talking about has no relevance in today&#8217;s world and many recent researches have proved that so called Aryans were original inhabitants of the Indus Valley Civilization.</p>
<p>Every religion in this world, including Christianity and Islam have &#8220;Popes&#8221; and &#8220;Caliphs&#8221; to formulate rules and guidelines for their followers and the same is also true for Hinduism to some extent. However, if the Church says that the Earth is the center of the Universe, then are you going to believe them? or find out the truth on your own.</p>
<p>The killer of Gandhi cannot be termed as  a Hindu or preacher of Gita. He was just a brain washed Lunatic who could never understand the true meaning of Gita or Hinduism. Therefore, calling him a preacher of Hinduism is similar to saying that &#8220;Jehadis&#8221; are followers of Islam.</p>
<p>If you want to talk about facts then please verify them before using them as Krishna never killed his uncle without any reason. He killed him because his uncle was known for his atrocious and oppressive rule. He did what was in the benefit of mankind even if it meant killing his own uncle. Thus he was following his Karma.</p>
<p>Yes, I agree that some of the Indians see many religions with suspicion but their is a scientific explanation for this behavior. The Indian Society has faced the brutality and atrocities of many outsiders like Mughals and Britishers for hundreds of years who tried to impose their religious views on the Indian people with brute force. Thus this attitude of some Indians was used by the fanatics to their advantage and for personal gains.</p>
<p>However, a rational person whether he is a Hindu, Christian or a Muslim knows that the almighty has given him a very powerful weapon to protect himself from these evil ideas and that is his own conscience. I am a Hindu and respect Jesus, Allah, Moses, and Krishna in the same way as I know that it is the God in the end to whom I am accountable.</p>
<p>I hope this will clear some of your misconceptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katinka - Spirituality</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2010/karma-bhagavad-gita/comment-page-1/#comment-26902</link>
		<dc:creator>Katinka - Spirituality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 06:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=913#comment-26902</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe in blaming the text for the actions of believers. The Bhagavad Gita is about the eternal struggle between accepting what is, and doing something about it. It also teaches that there will be justice in the end. As such, the killer of Gandhi simply did not understand the Gita well enough. Anyhow, Gandhi himself was inspired by the Gita too - so it apparently goes both ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe in blaming the text for the actions of believers. The Bhagavad Gita is about the eternal struggle between accepting what is, and doing something about it. It also teaches that there will be justice in the end. As such, the killer of Gandhi simply did not understand the Gita well enough. Anyhow, Gandhi himself was inspired by the Gita too &#8211; so it apparently goes both ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Wloch</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2010/karma-bhagavad-gita/comment-page-1/#comment-26845</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Wloch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=913#comment-26845</guid>
		<description>The name Krishna in Sanskrit means black or the colour of the night sky or ocean. In India most idols of Krishna are in black, but why the sky blue? The language of Buddha was Dravidian and not Sanskrit based. The Dravidian based are dark and live in southern India. The horse and chariot were introduced into India by a light-skinned people - the Aryan Indo-European connection. The young Hindu, Nathuram Godses, who shot and killed Mahatma Gandhi carried a copy of the Baghavadgita to his trial. True followers of Krishna were not to compromise with other religions but had to remain orthodox; in fact Srila Prabhupada before founding the Hare Krishna in America when he was young and unknown had written Gandhi just a month or so before, forewarning him to dispense with compromising with the Muslims and Christians in the creation of the India Republic and to seek a Krishna guru ... or else!
This is what the brother of Nathuram uttered: &quot;Yes! I Killed Mohandas Gandhi and I am Glad I Did It!

That is what Gopal Godse said as he prepares for his final vindication, the election of India&#039;s first ultra-Hindu nationalist government.
Gopal Godse spent 18 years in prison for his role in the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi. His brother and one other conspirator were hanged by the neck until dead.
But it was all worth it, says Gopal Godse.

Now these conspirators, who to this day are celebrated by strict Hindus, took the literal advise of the sky-blue coloured Krishna and did the work or karma that Arjuna was instructed to perform without one idle thought. Another odd thing if one investigates is that at age nine Krishna killed his uncle who he termed a demon. Now to the orthodox Hindus the followers of Islam or Buddhism, etc. are tantamount to being demons. Why else were the Buddhists driven out of India by the Hindus? Sri Lanka, an island, became one of the refuges for the dark-skinned non-Sanskrit based believers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The name Krishna in Sanskrit means black or the colour of the night sky or ocean. In India most idols of Krishna are in black, but why the sky blue? The language of Buddha was Dravidian and not Sanskrit based. The Dravidian based are dark and live in southern India. The horse and chariot were introduced into India by a light-skinned people &#8211; the Aryan Indo-European connection. The young Hindu, Nathuram Godses, who shot and killed Mahatma Gandhi carried a copy of the Baghavadgita to his trial. True followers of Krishna were not to compromise with other religions but had to remain orthodox; in fact Srila Prabhupada before founding the Hare Krishna in America when he was young and unknown had written Gandhi just a month or so before, forewarning him to dispense with compromising with the Muslims and Christians in the creation of the India Republic and to seek a Krishna guru &#8230; or else!<br />
This is what the brother of Nathuram uttered: &#8220;Yes! I Killed Mohandas Gandhi and I am Glad I Did It!</p>
<p>That is what Gopal Godse said as he prepares for his final vindication, the election of India&#8217;s first ultra-Hindu nationalist government.<br />
Gopal Godse spent 18 years in prison for his role in the assassination of Mahatma Gandhi. His brother and one other conspirator were hanged by the neck until dead.<br />
But it was all worth it, says Gopal Godse.</p>
<p>Now these conspirators, who to this day are celebrated by strict Hindus, took the literal advise of the sky-blue coloured Krishna and did the work or karma that Arjuna was instructed to perform without one idle thought. Another odd thing if one investigates is that at age nine Krishna killed his uncle who he termed a demon. Now to the orthodox Hindus the followers of Islam or Buddhism, etc. are tantamount to being demons. Why else were the Buddhists driven out of India by the Hindus? Sri Lanka, an island, became one of the refuges for the dark-skinned non-Sanskrit based believers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddhist quotes about rebirth, reincarnation and karma &#124; quotes and sayings</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2010/karma-bhagavad-gita/comment-page-1/#comment-20427</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddhist quotes about rebirth, reincarnation and karma &#124; quotes and sayings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 11:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=913#comment-20427</guid>
		<description>[...] Karma in the Bhagavad Gita &#124; Hinduism and India [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Karma in the Bhagavad Gita | Hinduism and India [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buddha quotes on karma &#124; quotes and sayings</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2010/karma-bhagavad-gita/comment-page-1/#comment-20425</link>
		<dc:creator>Buddha quotes on karma &#124; quotes and sayings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 11:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=913#comment-20425</guid>
		<description>[...] Karma in the Bhagavad Gita &#124; Hinduism and India [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Karma in the Bhagavad Gita | Hinduism and India [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim McGinnis</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2010/karma-bhagavad-gita/comment-page-1/#comment-9864</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim McGinnis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=913#comment-9864</guid>
		<description>I have always been fascinated with karma, and believe it is a natural occurrence stemming from our thoughts, words and actions, whether they be good or bad. I read a book recently called &quot;Wake Up! Your Life is Calling,&quot; by a man named Andy Feld. I mention this book because the author talked a lot about self responsibility, and I believe that when people take responsibility for their karma they are taking responsibility for the lives they create.
thanks for listening,
kim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have always been fascinated with karma, and believe it is a natural occurrence stemming from our thoughts, words and actions, whether they be good or bad. I read a book recently called &#8220;Wake Up! Your Life is Calling,&#8221; by a man named Andy Feld. I mention this book because the author talked a lot about self responsibility, and I believe that when people take responsibility for their karma they are taking responsibility for the lives they create.<br />
thanks for listening,<br />
kim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katinka - Spirituality</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2010/karma-bhagavad-gita/comment-page-1/#comment-8603</link>
		<dc:creator>Katinka - Spirituality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=913#comment-8603</guid>
		<description>Wordpress, which I use as a blogging platform, automatically decides which posts are going through, which are going to be moderated, and which will be labeled &#039;spam&#039;. Don&#039;t worry about it. It&#039;s nothing personal. 
As long as your comments don&#039;t go into the spam cue, they WILL appear on my blog as long as they are on topic. It may just take a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WordPress, which I use as a blogging platform, automatically decides which posts are going through, which are going to be moderated, and which will be labeled &#8216;spam&#8217;. Don&#8217;t worry about it. It&#8217;s nothing personal.<br />
As long as your comments don&#8217;t go into the spam cue, they WILL appear on my blog as long as they are on topic. It may just take a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satish Bhat</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2010/karma-bhagavad-gita/comment-page-1/#comment-8551</link>
		<dc:creator>Satish Bhat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 03:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=913#comment-8551</guid>
		<description>Dear Katinka
I did not realize that my expressions were on the border of moderation. I just wrote out whatever came to my mind. In fact, to be moderate in whatever one does is an important message of Bhagavad Gita (verse 6.7). It just shows how much more I have to travel. Not only I must get exposed to the messages, I must also assimilate them and express them as my own. Yes, that is the formula – exposure, assimilation and expression. One thing is sure – it is fun all along.
Dear Katinka, thanx for pointing out my lapses so kindly. I may not be able to write as well as you do – but, I can surely admire those of you who are doing it so well. Through your web, you are doing a good job – helping those who want such help. As for me, even if I do not fare as well – it matters not. My joy is in doing my karma – it is prevalent both in success and failure – which, incidentally, is another message of Bhagavad Gita (verse 2.48).

Keep up your good work.
Satish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Katinka<br />
I did not realize that my expressions were on the border of moderation. I just wrote out whatever came to my mind. In fact, to be moderate in whatever one does is an important message of Bhagavad Gita (verse 6.7). It just shows how much more I have to travel. Not only I must get exposed to the messages, I must also assimilate them and express them as my own. Yes, that is the formula – exposure, assimilation and expression. One thing is sure – it is fun all along.<br />
Dear Katinka, thanx for pointing out my lapses so kindly. I may not be able to write as well as you do – but, I can surely admire those of you who are doing it so well. Through your web, you are doing a good job – helping those who want such help. As for me, even if I do not fare as well – it matters not. My joy is in doing my karma – it is prevalent both in success and failure – which, incidentally, is another message of Bhagavad Gita (verse 2.48).</p>
<p>Keep up your good work.<br />
Satish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: www.allconsidering.com @ 2012-02-07 09:21:49 -->
