<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blavatsky on Atlantis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.allconsidering.com/2009/blavatsky-on-atlantis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2009/blavatsky-on-atlantis/</link>
	<description>Considering life, spiritual growth and more ponderings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 05:11:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katinka Hesselink - All Considering</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2009/blavatsky-on-atlantis/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Katinka Hesselink - All Considering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 05:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=556#comment-410</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s alright - since you credit this post in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s alright &#8211; since you credit this post in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark walter</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2009/blavatsky-on-atlantis/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>mark walter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 02:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=556#comment-416</guid>
		<description>I have &#039;borrowed&#039; a bit of the end of your post, and re-posted it on my own site, to help make a point about this thing, this &#039;it&#039;, that we call - among many other things - spiritual power, spiritual ability, energy, and so on.
http://eternalawareness.ning.com/profiles/blogs/what-is-it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have &#8216;borrowed&#8217; a bit of the end of your post, and re-posted it on my own site, to help make a point about this thing, this &#8216;it&#8217;, that we call &#8211; among many other things &#8211; spiritual power, spiritual ability, energy, and so on.</p>
<p><a href="http://eternalawareness.ning.com/profiles/blogs/what-is-it" rel="nofollow">http://eternalawareness.ning.com/profiles/blogs/what-is-it</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2009/blavatsky-on-atlantis/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 11:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=556#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Hi Katinka, I agree that Evolution of Consciousness doesn&#039;t necessarily have to correspond directly with physical evolution.  Do you find it interesting that the Hindu&#039;s have a Monkey God: Hanuman?  I have heard that some scholars believe that modern man lived alongside a less evolved species.  Is this merely a coincidence.  There are many extraodinary things found in Vedic writings that correspond extraordinarily well with modern findings.
God Bless,
Hari Om</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Katinka, I agree that Evolution of Consciousness doesn&#8217;t necessarily have to correspond directly with physical evolution.  Do you find it interesting that the Hindu&#8217;s have a Monkey God: Hanuman?  I have heard that some scholars believe that modern man lived alongside a less evolved species.  Is this merely a coincidence.  There are many extraodinary things found in Vedic writings that correspond extraordinarily well with modern findings.</p>
<p>God Bless,<br />
Hari Om</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katinka - spiritual</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2009/blavatsky-on-atlantis/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>katinka - spiritual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 08:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=556#comment-414</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with Greekgeek that not all Blavatsky&#039;s details can be fit into what we know about the fossil record. I think it&#039;s rather remarkable that Blavatsky managed to get the date of the Miocene more closely correct than the scientists of her time did. But that does not mean the rest of her story can bear closer scrutiny. I&#039;m not yet decided on this issue. On the one hand I do feel that the evolution of consciousness does not have to have been dependent on the physical as it is now. On the other: I do feel science should be respected for what it DOES know - and it does know an awful lot about these things by now. The physical evolution of humanity for one.
And Jim: I don&#039;t mind long comments :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with Greekgeek that not all Blavatsky&#8217;s details can be fit into what we know about the fossil record. I think it&#8217;s rather remarkable that Blavatsky managed to get the date of the Miocene more closely correct than the scientists of her time did. But that does not mean the rest of her story can bear closer scrutiny. I&#8217;m not yet decided on this issue. On the one hand I do feel that the evolution of consciousness does not have to have been dependent on the physical as it is now. On the other: I do feel science should be respected for what it DOES know &#8211; and it does know an awful lot about these things by now. The physical evolution of humanity for one.</p>
<p>And Jim: I don&#8217;t mind long comments <img src='http://www.allconsidering.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2009/blavatsky-on-atlantis/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=556#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Hi Katinka,
                      Great post.  In regards to &quot;Greekgeek&#039;s&quot; comments, I personally don&#039;t feel that we have enough knowledge yet to make absolute statements about the development of humanity, Scientists tend to speculate using the information available to them at the time, and somehow these speculations become &quot;fact&quot;.  However, I am also quite skeptical to accepting literally the tales of millions of years of human development and civilization.  Amongst esoteric writings their are countless contradictory accounts of the &quot;Real History of Humanity&quot;.  However, from what I&#039;ve heard of Edgar Cayce&#039;s writings on Atlantis, their did seem to be some common elements with what Blavatsky had written.
I wonder whether you&#039;ve read of Graham Hancock?  He wrote an excellent, serious and scholarly book &quot;Underworld&quot; showing the mountain of evidence to support the thesis that human civilization extends alot further back than most Archeologist&#039;s and Historian&#039;s are willing to accept.  He showed how all around the world there were cities off the coasts that were either 30 metres or 30 feet (I forget) below the surface.  (Look up the Yonaguni Monument).  He concluded that when the last Ice Age came to an end (I think around 10 - 7,000 BCE) the sea level rose and flooded all the major cities of the various civilizations.  As today, we tend to build major cities at sea level close to the ocean for obvious practical reasons.
My personal feelings are that many ancient civilizations retained culture from this pre-deluge civilization, but that most of the histories of this have been destroyed, much of which due to the Christian madness of the Dark Ages.  I suspect however, that the Vedic library is an unbroken tradition dating back way into pre-history.  It&#039;s not that they are the only civilization to have passed through these periods, only that their&#039;s is the only library to have survived.
Thanks for the explanation of Blavatsky&#039;s definition of Black Magic, I see the point.  I have met quite a few people who have had natural psychic abilities but have not wanted to seriously study Spirituality.  In EVERY case, things have gone badly as they have stepped into very dangerous ground.  I think an essential part of Spiritual development is acknowledging that we need instruction from those that have gone before us.
However, due to the dogmatic acceptence of the masses in some regards, many people today are skeptical of any authority, and any orthodoxy, even an Occult orthodoxy.
Sorry about the length of my comment, I haven&#039;t yet mastered the art of keeping it short (as anyone that has seen my blog would know!  LOL).
Take care,
God Bless,
Hari Om,
                  Jim Clark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Katinka,<br />
                      Great post.  In regards to &#8220;Greekgeek&#8217;s&#8221; comments, I personally don&#8217;t feel that we have enough knowledge yet to make absolute statements about the development of humanity, Scientists tend to speculate using the information available to them at the time, and somehow these speculations become &#8220;fact&#8221;.  However, I am also quite skeptical to accepting literally the tales of millions of years of human development and civilization.  Amongst esoteric writings their are countless contradictory accounts of the &#8220;Real History of Humanity&#8221;.  However, from what I&#8217;ve heard of Edgar Cayce&#8217;s writings on Atlantis, their did seem to be some common elements with what Blavatsky had written.</p>
<p>I wonder whether you&#8217;ve read of Graham Hancock?  He wrote an excellent, serious and scholarly book &#8220;Underworld&#8221; showing the mountain of evidence to support the thesis that human civilization extends alot further back than most Archeologist&#8217;s and Historian&#8217;s are willing to accept.  He showed how all around the world there were cities off the coasts that were either 30 metres or 30 feet (I forget) below the surface.  (Look up the Yonaguni Monument).  He concluded that when the last Ice Age came to an end (I think around 10 &#8211; 7,000 BCE) the sea level rose and flooded all the major cities of the various civilizations.  As today, we tend to build major cities at sea level close to the ocean for obvious practical reasons.</p>
<p>My personal feelings are that many ancient civilizations retained culture from this pre-deluge civilization, but that most of the histories of this have been destroyed, much of which due to the Christian madness of the Dark Ages.  I suspect however, that the Vedic library is an unbroken tradition dating back way into pre-history.  It&#8217;s not that they are the only civilization to have passed through these periods, only that their&#8217;s is the only library to have survived.</p>
<p>Thanks for the explanation of Blavatsky&#8217;s definition of Black Magic, I see the point.  I have met quite a few people who have had natural psychic abilities but have not wanted to seriously study Spirituality.  In EVERY case, things have gone badly as they have stepped into very dangerous ground.  I think an essential part of Spiritual development is acknowledging that we need instruction from those that have gone before us.</p>
<p>However, due to the dogmatic acceptence of the masses in some regards, many people today are skeptical of any authority, and any orthodoxy, even an Occult orthodoxy.</p>
<p>Sorry about the length of my comment, I haven&#8217;t yet mastered the art of keeping it short (as anyone that has seen my blog would know!  LOL).</p>
<p>Take care,<br />
God Bless,<br />
Hari Om,<br />
                  Jim Clark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katinka - spiritual</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2009/blavatsky-on-atlantis/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>katinka - spiritual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 16:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=556#comment-412</guid>
		<description>Well, you know, Blavatsky wrote all that at a time when science hadn&#039;t quite decided on what those geological periods were themselves. It&#039;s also not quite clear from her writings whether she was referring to physical humans, or spiritual beings at the time of Atlantis (or not clear to me anyhow). Her definition of &#039;human&#039;  is rather wider than most - it&#039;s any being that thinks for themselves. And that would include angels for instance (who she refers to as former human beings, as they are thought to have evolved beyond the human state).
Thanks for replying though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you know, Blavatsky wrote all that at a time when science hadn&#8217;t quite decided on what those geological periods were themselves. It&#8217;s also not quite clear from her writings whether she was referring to physical humans, or spiritual beings at the time of Atlantis (or not clear to me anyhow). Her definition of &#8216;human&#8217;  is rather wider than most &#8211; it&#8217;s any being that thinks for themselves. And that would include angels for instance (who she refers to as former human beings, as they are thought to have evolved beyond the human state).</p>
<p>Thanks for replying though <img src='http://www.allconsidering.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greekgeek</title>
		<link>http://www.allconsidering.com/2009/blavatsky-on-atlantis/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Greekgeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 15:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.allconsidering.com/?p=556#comment-411</guid>
		<description>I love all the different myths Plato&#039;s myth has spawned (and by &quot;myth&quot; I am speaking in the Joseph Campbell sense). My scientific side is amused and appalled at the random references to geological periods which seem to be plucked out of a hat: we&#039;re talking a time when human ancestors were tiny, very primitive&lt;a href=&quot;http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/genetics/divergence/wilford_early_hominid_article_2007.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;early hominids&lt;/a&gt; who had not developed tool use and may not yet have had the anatomy to talk! As usual, the big mistake Atlantis buffs make is in assuming that &lt;I&gt;just because world mythologies have recurring themes, they are referring to the same historical episode&lt;/i&gt;. The same things occur in our lives (and dreams, and fears) over and over, so similar myths are spawned. Volcanoes erupt. Tidal waves happen. Each natural disaster can feed into the myths of natural disasters, without necessarily all referring to the SAME natural disaster, or any particular one.
So every Katrina, every Krakatoa, every Lisbon Earthquake in ancient times, even in pre-human times, is regarded by somebody as THE Atlantis, and then they start trying to look for evidence of THAT disaster in every world mythology.
Plato invented several myths for teaching purposes, usually saying &quot;a friend of a friend&quot; told him about it. The myth of Er and the myth of the --whatever the name of the spring was in the &lt;I&gt;Phaedrus&lt;/I&gt;, I&#039;ve forgotten-- don&#039;t seem to have captured our imagination like the Atlantis myth, though.
I say this as someone who wrote a 300+ page book about Atlantis as a child. Who loves the Atlantis Myth. Who went to Santorini and stood in the ruins of that ancient city which is &lt;I&gt;my&lt;/I&gt; Atlantis, destroyed in a cataclysm in the Minoan period (just prior to Greece) which really &lt;I&gt;must&lt;/I&gt; have left its imprint in the people around the Mediterranean, such that it would&#039;ve been recorded in Egypt and remembered by word of mouth in Greece. It was four times the size of Krakatoa, and the Indonesian tsunami a few years back gives us some idea of the scale of the devastation it wrought.
I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mythphile.com/2008/03/01/atlantis/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wrote at length on Atlantis&lt;/a&gt; on my own blog a while ago and should stop typing here... but anyway...
while I can&#039;t believe anything Blavatsky says, I&#039;m falling into the same trap: being too literal. Literally, no, that&#039;s all bunk. Metaphorically, though, humans have a strange yearning for what&#039;s lost, a sense that &quot;We are not now that strength which in old days / Moved earth and heaven&quot; -- Tennyson, &quot;Ulysses&quot;. Every cataclysm speaks to us of a &lt;I&gt;reason&lt;/I&gt; why things aren&#039;t the way they used to be. And cataclysms, mighty civilizations laid low, fascinate us. We keep projecting farther back, all the way to Eden, this fall from grace, or this fall from a time when things are better than they are now. We keep looking for Atlantis. We want to know that magic once existed, which still lives in our imaginations and dreams, and which doesn&#039;t seem to be in the world around us. We want wonders to be true. Rather than admitting that the mythic world we yearn for doesn&#039;t &lt;I&gt;literally&lt;/i&gt; exist (though again, that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s a lie... see Joseph Campbell on metaphor, the Sufis, and &lt;I&gt;imaginal reality&lt;/I&gt;), we say it once existed, and is gone.
I always fall back on the wisdom of Tolkien, who understood this about myth, even while writing his own myths about a world that wasn&#039;t but might-have-been: &quot;In the cosmogony there is a fall: a fall of Angels we should say. Though quite different in form, of course, to that of Christian myth. These tales are &#039;new&#039;, they are not directly derived from other myths and legends, but they must inevitably contain a large measure of ancient wide-spread motives or elements. After all, I believe that legends and myths are largely made of &#039;truth&#039;, and indeed present aspects of it that can only be received in this mode; and long ago certain truths and modes of this kind were discovered and must always reappear. There cannot be any &#039;story&#039; without a fall – all stories are ultimately about the fall – at least not for human minds as we know them and have them.&quot; -- JRR Tolkien &lt;I&gt;Letters&lt;/I&gt; 131
And there, I&#039;ve given you a reply longer than your post, when I meant to be working on my own lenses. I apologize for taking Blavatsky to task and exploding some of your post! But it just proves the ultimate truth: Plato may have (as I think) mostly invented the Atlantis legend, or else that it wasa very local episode nothing like what many &quot;Atlantis experts&quot; now say it is... yet in the imaginal world, Atlantis has taken root, and many of us are fired by it and gripped by its aura. We seek it. It holds some truth for us, the truth Tolkien describes, which can only be conveyed through myth, not literal facts and reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love all the different myths Plato&#8217;s myth has spawned (and by &#8220;myth&#8221; I am speaking in the Joseph Campbell sense). My scientific side is amused and appalled at the random references to geological periods which seem to be plucked out of a hat: we&#8217;re talking a time when human ancestors were tiny, very primitive<a href="http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/genetics/divergence/wilford_early_hominid_article_2007.html" rel="nofollow">early hominids</a> who had not developed tool use and may not yet have had the anatomy to talk! As usual, the big mistake Atlantis buffs make is in assuming that <i>just because world mythologies have recurring themes, they are referring to the same historical episode</i>. The same things occur in our lives (and dreams, and fears) over and over, so similar myths are spawned. Volcanoes erupt. Tidal waves happen. Each natural disaster can feed into the myths of natural disasters, without necessarily all referring to the SAME natural disaster, or any particular one.</p>
<p>So every Katrina, every Krakatoa, every Lisbon Earthquake in ancient times, even in pre-human times, is regarded by somebody as THE Atlantis, and then they start trying to look for evidence of THAT disaster in every world mythology.</p>
<p>Plato invented several myths for teaching purposes, usually saying &#8220;a friend of a friend&#8221; told him about it. The myth of Er and the myth of the &#8211;whatever the name of the spring was in the <i>Phaedrus</i>, I&#8217;ve forgotten&#8211; don&#8217;t seem to have captured our imagination like the Atlantis myth, though.</p>
<p>I say this as someone who wrote a 300+ page book about Atlantis as a child. Who loves the Atlantis Myth. Who went to Santorini and stood in the ruins of that ancient city which is <i>my</i> Atlantis, destroyed in a cataclysm in the Minoan period (just prior to Greece) which really <i>must</i> have left its imprint in the people around the Mediterranean, such that it would&#8217;ve been recorded in Egypt and remembered by word of mouth in Greece. It was four times the size of Krakatoa, and the Indonesian tsunami a few years back gives us some idea of the scale of the devastation it wrought.</p>
<p>I <a href="http://www.mythphile.com/2008/03/01/atlantis/" rel="nofollow">wrote at length on Atlantis</a> on my own blog a while ago and should stop typing here&#8230; but anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>while I can&#8217;t believe anything Blavatsky says, I&#8217;m falling into the same trap: being too literal. Literally, no, that&#8217;s all bunk. Metaphorically, though, humans have a strange yearning for what&#8217;s lost, a sense that &#8220;We are not now that strength which in old days / Moved earth and heaven&#8221; &#8212; Tennyson, &#8220;Ulysses&#8221;. Every cataclysm speaks to us of a <i>reason</i> why things aren&#8217;t the way they used to be. And cataclysms, mighty civilizations laid low, fascinate us. We keep projecting farther back, all the way to Eden, this fall from grace, or this fall from a time when things are better than they are now. We keep looking for Atlantis. We want to know that magic once existed, which still lives in our imaginations and dreams, and which doesn&#8217;t seem to be in the world around us. We want wonders to be true. Rather than admitting that the mythic world we yearn for doesn&#8217;t <i>literally</i> exist (though again, that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s a lie&#8230; see Joseph Campbell on metaphor, the Sufis, and <i>imaginal reality</i>), we say it once existed, and is gone.</p>
<p>I always fall back on the wisdom of Tolkien, who understood this about myth, even while writing his own myths about a world that wasn&#8217;t but might-have-been: &#8220;In the cosmogony there is a fall: a fall of Angels we should say. Though quite different in form, of course, to that of Christian myth. These tales are &#8216;new&#8217;, they are not directly derived from other myths and legends, but they must inevitably contain a large measure of ancient wide-spread motives or elements. After all, I believe that legends and myths are largely made of &#8216;truth&#8217;, and indeed present aspects of it that can only be received in this mode; and long ago certain truths and modes of this kind were discovered and must always reappear. There cannot be any &#8216;story&#8217; without a fall – all stories are ultimately about the fall – at least not for human minds as we know them and have them.&#8221; &#8212; JRR Tolkien <i>Letters</i> 131</p>
<p>And there, I&#8217;ve given you a reply longer than your post, when I meant to be working on my own lenses. I apologize for taking Blavatsky to task and exploding some of your post! But it just proves the ultimate truth: Plato may have (as I think) mostly invented the Atlantis legend, or else that it wasa very local episode nothing like what many &#8220;Atlantis experts&#8221; now say it is&#8230; yet in the imaginal world, Atlantis has taken root, and many of us are fired by it and gripped by its aura. We seek it. It holds some truth for us, the truth Tolkien describes, which can only be conveyed through myth, not literal facts and reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
